- Focus Areas
RESEARCH & benchmarking
EDM Council Research
In support of our membership the EDM Council conducts research into a variety of data management topics and evolving trends. Together with industry subject matter experts, the EDMC aspires to evaluate these trends, collaborate with industry and produce valuable resources for our membership. Topics include defining critical data elements (CDE), data implications for analytics, AI and Machine Learning and evaluation of regulations and their data management impacts.
As part of the research agenda the EDM Council conducts periodic industry wide benchmarks. The 2017 Benchmarking study consists of 22 DCAM-derived questions that highlight the most essential concepts in data management. The results include comparison to the previous study performed in 2015. Participants included the full spectrum of financial services companies (universal, buy, sell, asset servicing, insurance) with an emphasis on G-SIBs and Tier 1 firms. We hand selected a "control group" of companies that we knew had demonstrated an organizational commitment to data management as the baseline for evaluating overall industry progress.
"There are clearly some bright spots for the practice of data management. We have made progress in overcoming the inertia of organizational change management. But the underlying truth remains. We can't respond to regulatory pressure, achieve automation or put data to work until we fix the underlying data challenges. The EDM Council believes these obstacles can be addressed.“
Key Findings and Highlights
The biennial study, done in collaboration with industry leader Sapient Consulting and Pellustro (the DCAM assessment platform developed by boutique strategy firm Element22) found progress towards setting up enterprise-wide data management programs and implementing data governance, however it also highlighted several key areas where industry capabilities lag in meeting the requirements set out by global regulators and market authorities.
The survey covers 22 of the most essential concepts extracted from the Council’s Data Management Capability Assessment Model (DCAM), and received responses from over 150 financial institutions.
Benchmark Response Overview...
Establishing the Program
Data management as a core part of the way financial institutions operate is growing, but not fully entranched. There has been some advancement in establishing a true “data management culture” particularly among G-SIBs and Tier 1 buy-side firms. Over 70% of the industry, and 90% of G-SIBs, now have a Chief Data Officer.
The industry has made substantial progress in establishing foundational governance defining organizational structures, implementing data stewardship and implementing operational policy.
Work is underway on defining lineage, managing critical data and implementing data management glossaries. This is the core building block for meeting the regulatory goals of harmonized data neccessary for linked risk analysis but progress has been slow to mature. Only 8% of the industry has achieved the harmonization of meaning of data across all internal repositories.
The industry is still mired in manual reconciliation of data and mapping from physical repositories to applications and reports. Trust and confidence in the data used for regulatory reporting and business analytics remains an elusive goal of these data management programs. Just 13% of the industry has achieved the definition and implementation of control procedures for managing data quality.
There is a growing understanding of data as a shared resource and timely progress in managing the collaboration between data, information technology, business applications and control functions such as information security and privacy.
Benchmark Survey Questions
1. Our organization has a defined and endorsed data management strategy
2. The goals, objectives and authorities of the data management program are well communicated
3. The data management program is established and has the authority to enforce adherence
4. Stakeholders understand (and buy into) the need for the data management program
5. The funding model for the data management program is established and sanctioned
6. The costs of (and benefits associated with) the data management program are being measured
7. The data management program is sufficiently resourced
8. Data management operates collaboratively with existing enterprise control functions
9. Data governance structure and authority is implemented and communicated
10. Governance “owners” and “stewards” are in place with clearly defined roles and responsibilities
11. Data policies and standards are documented, implemented and enforced
12. The end user community is adhering to the data governance policy and standards
13. The business meaning of data is defined, harmonized across repositories and governed
14. Critical data elements are identified and managed
15. Logical data domains have been declared, prioritized and sanctioned
16. End-to-end data lineage has been defined across the entire data lifecycle
17. Technical architecture is defined and integrated (NEW QUESTION ADDED IN THE 2017 SURVEY)
18. All data under the authority of the Data Management Program is profiled, analyzed and graded
19. Procedures for managing data quality are defined, implemented and measured
20. Root cause analysis is performed and corrective measures are being implemented
21. Technology standards and governance are in place to support data management objectives
22. The data management program is aligned with internal technical and operational capabilities